Today, we had the
first Rapid Fire or Post-Call Morning Report at Toronto General Hospital since 2013! For those familiar with this in other
hospitals, the goal of this type of morning report is to discuss high-level
management issues regarding a number of the patients referred overnight. Rather than focusing on a single case more
from a diagnostic perspective, we focused on several cases with valuable
teaching points and more of a management perspective.
There were multiple
learning points:
-We don’t see a lot of
patients with acute coronary syndromes on the medicine service as many of these patients go to cardiology.
The first patient was a patient with previously documented coronary
disease and acute coronary syndromes, who presented with chest discomfort not
unlike prior MI’s. The pain began at
rest and resolved at rest, but was otherwise relatively typical in
character. The patient was treated as a
NSTEMI. We discussed the role of
Clopidogrel (Plavix®) in this situation.
The original CURE trial would have only recommended clopidogrel in very
high risk situations. The latest AHA
2014 guidelines, however, do recommend dual
antiplatelet (ASA and clopidogrel) in all patients with NSTEMI for 12
months regardless of management strategy.
New players in the dual antiplatelet market are Ticagrelor (Brilinta®)
and Prasugrel (Effient®). These drugs
are recommended in lieu of clopidogrel if PCI and stenting is likely, or if
patients are presenting with an ST-segment elevation event. They are much
more effective antiplatelets than clopidogrel.
In addition to ASA and a second antiplatelet, the 2014 AHA guidelines
recommend that all patients receive anticoagulation with a low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated
heparin, or fondaparinux (helpful here because it’s the lower DVT prophylaxis
dose) for the duration of the
hospitalization, or until PCI is performed.
-We talked briefly
about hypertensive urgency and emergency. The case involved a woman with a
bloodpressure of 220/110mmHg. There are
no definite blood pressure cutoffs for urgency vs. emergency. The usual way of distinguishing them is
whether end-organ damage is
present. This would include hemorrhagic
stroke, aortic dissection, flash pulmonary edema, chest discomfort or a
demand-related troponin elevation, acute kidney injury from hypertension, limb
ischemia, etc. If emergency is present,
this usually warrants ICU admission with invasive blood pressure monitoring,
and IV antihypertensive agents. The goal
is to reduce the MAP by around 25% within the first 24 hours because cerebral
autoregulation may be accustomed to much higher blood pressures – reducing them
to normotension immediately could be dangerous.
Hypertensive urgency on the other hand does not even always require
hospital admission, and can be followed up as an outpatient with changes or
adherence to oral medications.
-We talked about a
young man (30’s) who had been found wandering the clinical areas and was
referred to internal medicine for a presumed delirium or altered level of
consciousness. Because there were
volitional changes in his level of consciousness and alertness, a psychiatric
cause was much more likely. The patient
chose to leave AMA. The learning point
is that, despite it being a little bit ageist, the approach to a 30-year-old
who is wandering, aggressive, or disoriented is usually different than that of
an 80-year-old with the same syndrome. A
primary, new diagnosis of a psychiatric disease is almost impossible in the
latter case.
-We talked about a
young woman with disordered eating behavior who had substantial electrolyte
disturbances. In these situations, it is
helpful to exclude diuretic abuse as a cause of weight loss and electrolyte
abnormalities (an abnormally high urine chloride level >40mEq/L is usually
sufficient). The other teaching point
was related to refeeding syndrome and intravenous volume expansion. Giving high
volumes of isotonic fluid may exacerbate hypokalemia leading to
arrhythmias. Also, it is extremely
challenging to correct hypokalemia without correcting hypomagnesemia
first. Finally, the patient had a very
low phosphate which will predispose to weakness and even rhabdomyolysis. The challenge is that with feeding these
patients, their endogenous insulin secretion increases leading to potassium and
phosphate shifting inside cells and exacerbating measured electrolyte
abnormalities. This must be done
carefully, with monitoring, in a controlled environment.
-Finally, we talked
about someone with severe dementia and an inability to feed herself.
We often associate malignant (cancerous) diagnoses with the need for
palliation, but two overlooked clinical conditions are congestive heart failure
and dementia. Patients with severe
dementia and inability to drink water or feed themselves have a six-month
mortality worse than most cancers.
Likewise, patients with severe refractory heart failure and
complications like cardiorenal syndrome are similar. Our palliative care colleagues can be a
tremendously helpful resource in this situation, as education to families about
the futility of treatments like IV hydration and G-tubes is vital.
Image Credit: nursingcrib.com
Further Reading:
Amsterdam, E. A.,
Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., Casey, D. E., Ganiats, T. G., Holmes, D. R., ...
& Levine, G. N. (2014). 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of
patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on
Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64(24),
e139-e228.
Marik, P. E. (2015).
Hypertensive Crises. In Evidence-Based Critical Care (pp. 429-443).
Springer International Publishing.
Mitchell, S. L.
(2015). Advanced dementia. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(26),
2533-2540.
No comments:
Post a Comment