This week past we
discussed a case of a man presenting with a 3 week history of
worsening dyspnea. On chest x-ray he had a large right-sided pleural effusion.
There were several
teaching points for the case:
1.
Differential diagnosis of shortness of
breath: We discussed that
although there is a long differential diagnosis for shortness of breath,
operationally we are thinking about the top 3-4 most likely and serious causes
in our heads when seeing a patient. For shortness of breath this could include:
a.
Heart
failure
b.
Pneumonia
c.
COPD
d.
Acute
coronary syndrome
In this case, we
know there is a large right-sided pleural effusion, so it shapes our
differential diagnosis further.
Differential diagnosis of a pleural effusion includes:
Transudate
|
Exudate
|
Heart Failure
|
Infection (bacterial
parapneumonic, mycobacterial, fungal, viral, parasitic)
|
Nephrotic syndrome
|
Malignancy
|
Liver cirrhosis
|
PE
|
Constrictive pericarditis
|
Collagen vascular disease
(RA, SLE, GPA, EGPA)
|
GI (pancreatitis, esophageal
rupture)
|
|
Hemothorax
|
|
Chylothorax
|
|
Other (post-CABG,
post-radiation, uremia, drug-induced, sarcoidosis
|
As you can see, the
differential diagnosis is broken down by transudate and exudate. But how do we tell?
We do a diagnostic thoracentesis and
analyze the fluid using Light’s criteria.
-
Guidelines
suggest all effusions of >1cm in the decubitus view without a known
diagnosis should be investigated with a thoracentesis.
-
Guidelines
suggest diagnostic thoracentesis does not need to be performed for bilateral
effusions in a clinic setting strongly suggestive of a transudate (i.e. heart
failure)
-
Guidelines
suggest that for the initial diagnostic thoracentesis the following be sent:
o
Cytology,
protein, LDH, pH, Gram stain, culture and sensitivity
-
Don’t
forget to measure the serum LDH and total protein in order to be able to
calculate Light’s Criteria
Light’s Criteria
|
|
Pleural fluid total
protein/serum total protein
|
>0.5
|
Pleural fluid LDH/serum LDH
|
>0.6
|
Pleural fluid LDH
|
>2/3 upper limit of
normal
|
Note: any one of the above
positive = exudative. Highly sensitive (98%) but specificity 83% (will
misidentify some transudative effusions as exudative
|
Due to Light’s
Criteria proneness to misidentify some transudative effusions as exudative
(especially if there has been diuresis for heart failure which can concentrate
the fluid), one can use Extended Light’s Criteria to help clarify.
Extended
Light’s Criteria = total protein gradient
= serum total protein minus pleural
fluid total protein
The
fluid is transudative if the total protein gradient is > 31 g/L.
In this case the
pleural effusion was exudative on diagnostic thoracentesis.
When working up the
unilateral pleural effusion further the following diagnostic algorithm can be
used:
From the BTS guidelines on page 11 at: https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/document-library/clinical-information/pleural-disease/pleural-disease-guidelines-2010/pleural-disease-guideline/
From the BTS guidelines on page 11 at: https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/document-library/clinical-information/pleural-disease/pleural-disease-guidelines-2010/pleural-disease-guideline/
Further reading
Hooper C et al; BTS pleural guidelines group. Investigations
of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society Plerual
Disease Guideline 2010. Torax. 2010;65 Suppl 2.
McGrath EE, Anderson PB. Diagnosis of pleural effusion: a
systematic approach. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(2):119-27.
Craig, J., Gold, W. L., & Leis, J. A. (2013). A
44-year-old man with a parapneumonic effusion.Canadian Medical Association
Journal, 185(3),
232-234.
No comments:
Post a Comment